Breaking the ‘Actress’ Mould by Tara Kaushal

April 2016: Does the mainstreaming of actresses who are mothers, like Waluscha de Sousa, signal a shift in the way we see women?

The word 'actress' has been the subject of much feminist/linguistic questioning and debate. Must it be clubbed with obsolete words from a time when professions where the preserve of one sex—like authoress, comedienne, manageress, lady doctor, male nurse, male teacher—and, therefore, rejected? Or does it fall under the more advanced, newer envisioning of gender dynamic—different but equal—and, therefore, reclaimed? 

While I'm of the latter opinion, I am not surprised at its outright rejection by so many young female actors. (To quote Stephen Prichard of The Guardian, "Being obliged to describe someone as a 'female actor' suggests that we still consider the term ‘actor’ to be fundamentally male, so why not keep the unambiguous 'actress'?") After all, the word ‘actress’ does come with a whole lot of baggage.

An actress was necessarily a fair and virginal PYT, whose primary role was to evoke love, lust and longing in the hearts of fervid fans. Acting prowess was important but not paramount. In her private life, (the appearance of) virginity or at least singleness was a prerequisite. Marriage and/or age and most certainly kids dashed the illusion of her availability, and were the end of her career.

On the other hand, an actor evoked, or hoped to evoke adulation and respect, feelings different in quality from those reserved for actresses. More than just a pretty face, his acting style and persona were important. He could have a complicated love life and marry multiple times, not to mention run over people and assist terrorists. His ageing served to only increase the age gap between him and his female leads.

Divya Bharti, who acted in several successful movies after her marriage to Sajid Nadiadwala (cut short by her tragic death in under a year), may have been on her way to breaking the trend in the early 1990s. Then, we lost Juhi, Karishma, Madhuri, Sonali and Kajol to post-marriage sabbaticals, whether voluntary or not. Finally, this decade has seen Kareena Kapoor Khan, who lived with a much older man of a different religion before marrying him. Sunny Leone, who was a porn star and is married, loud and proud of both. Radhika Apte is married. So is South Indian actress Abhirami.

Enter former model Waluscha de Sousa, who makes her debut in Shah Rukh Khan's Fan later this week. A single mother of three at 33 (she's divorced from Marc Robinson who she married at 19), she breaks all stereotypes, and joins the ranks of women redefining the mores of Hindi cinema. Not to mention society in general, if art reflects life and vice versa.

After much ado about this thing, now let’s just hope she can act.


An edited version of this article appeared on iDiva in April 2016.

 

‘The Complete Man’ with Clay Feet by Tara Kaushal

April 2016: Are we setting unrealistic expectations for men in society and romance?

Everywhere you look, today, there’s someone or the other defining the idea of ‘The Complete Man’, not just Raymond that has done so for generations. From the overt messaging in comedy sketches to the covert criticism in the Ariel Share the Load ad emerges a fairly comprehensive picture of what this complete man should be.

He essays traditional masculine roles—handsome, successful, provider, carer, knight in shining armour—while being an equal and supportive partner, doting father, ideal son. He is concerned about his appearance (not so much to be dandy, not so little to forgive the curl of a nostril hair). He’s chivalrous (but not chauvinistic). He’s involved in the home and with the kids, but we’re not quite ready for househusbands (going by Ki & Ka and its unwitting reinforcement of gender stereotypes). He’s cultural yet contemporary, and imbibes the best of East and West. He’s jealous enough to make his woman feel ‘loved and protected’, but cool about exes, besties and colleagues that mill around. Mills and Boons meets Fifty Shades. And the jury’s still out on whether ‘real men’ cry, and how much, exactly, is acceptable?

Just like Rahul, the ‘perfect child’ in the recent masterpiece Kapoor & Sons, finds the pressure hard to bear, real men are falling short of these expectations. In romance and relationships too—where in our mothers’ generation, a man who merely didn’t beat or cheat on you and allowed you to work was considered a ‘keeper’, men today have many more complex criteria to meet.

In addition to fairy-tale happily-ever-afters, women now set out expecting this perfect, delicate combination… only to encounter mollycoddled mamas’ boys not raised to meet these expectations, confusedly negotiating a world that straddles dowry and Tinder. Even those with the best intent may fall navigating the emotional and sociocultural minefields that characterise our times.

Not for a moment am I suggesting that women should accept some of the shit that passed for partnership (romance, marriage, etc) in previous generations. And I wholeheartedly celebrate divorces that come from women knowing their minds and having the economic power to walk out when things don’t work out.

All I’m saying is that, just as men must celebrate real women and real beauty beyond Photoshop and media imaging—he shouldn’t expect “a maid in the living room, cook in the kitchen and whore in the bedroom,” to quote Jerry Hall—women too must ease up on the expectations of all-round perfection. People, relationships, aren’t born fully formed, and take time and patience even with The One.

Meanwhile, will candidates for ‘The Complete Man’ please stand up?


An edited version of this article appeared on iDiva in April 2016.

Interview: Sonali Bendre Behl by Tara Kaushal

January 2016: She’s self-made from the start, actor, wife and mother—this, you knew. Meet the Goth chic, deep thinker, voracious reader, design aficionado, fresh author of a parenting book and much more… Sonali Bendre is in bloom.

The cover of Good Housekeeping.

The cover of Good Housekeeping.

The door to Sonali and Goldie’s apartment opens to reveal a giant shiny silver Ganesha ensconced in an ornate domed mini temple, also in silver, at the end of the marble reception area. And although my pre-interview expectations had been conflicting—she’s of the era where you were ‘good friends’ until you were married; my interest had however been piqued by reviews that called her book honest and contemporary—whether or not I know it, I’ve subconsciously made up my mind in a split second. Traditional style, same-old same-old.

It’s the only explanation for why, seconds later, I was so incredibly surprised when I followed the help into the living room where I was to wait. It is dramatic, high-design, Goth-European. With lush wooden floors, deep blues and blacks, and bursting with books. Indian elements, so subtle you’d almost miss them, link the décor. I can’t get over it, and sneakily look around for a CCTV before taking a picture. (There wasn’t one, unlike most stars’ and modern parents’ homes. And I didn’t, just FYI.)

Over a long ambling conversation, interrupted only by the attention-seeking Isis-the-dog, Sonali Bendre Behl continues to surprise. She arrives, in a grey skater dress with nary a hint of make-up and accessories, and apologises for keeping me waiting. It’s been a hectic day organising her 10-year-old son Ranveer’s schedule (“He wants to do everything!”); and she’s been in constant touch with her publishers over her recent book, The Modern Gurukul: My Experiments with Parenting.

Becoming a mother, and then writing this book about her journey through motherhood have been the epochal moments of her life. Until Ranveer was born, she barely felt married—so footloose and fancy-free was life with her best friend and easy in-laws—and neither did Goldie. When she was pregnant, she was quite confident, blasé even: “I am a completely self-made person. It’s been a tough journey—I learnt on the job, worked 48 hours without sleeping… I’ve achieved all this, I can do anything.” So, having read everything there was to read, Superwoman had shrugged her shoulders and said, “So big deal! It’s a child! I will deal with it!”

And, she got put in her place. “It’s nothing like what the books tell you.” The first six months were hell. “First, it was a fight to say why is my square peg not fitting into this round hole, but it didn’t. It’s an individual with a mind of his or her own already.” And then she accepted it was not going to happen. “You just figure that, whatever anyone says, you have to start figuring things out vis-à-vis your child.”

As she explains in her book, when she started looking for answers, they were everywhere. In storybooks and TED Talks, newspaper articles and celeb interviews, and in discussions with girlfriends who were also mothers. Her quest eventually led her to the gurukul system, where the emphasis was on raising a ‘compassionate human being using a holistic approach.’

As her tattered bible of notes became rather famous, her girlfriends sparked the idea of getting it published. “It was a big laugh at first,” she says, though a chance party conversation had Random House interested.

It was only two years later, in 2014, that she got around to writing. She’d spent six months doing a TV show; by the time she finished, she had organised her life in such a way that it was working on her phone. Suddenly there was a new vacuum “and a vacuum is a dangerous place”—so for six months, while her husband was on shoot and Ranveer was at school, she wrote.

“Even history tells you that travelling is the best teacher. It makes you less judgemental and more open to accepting different kinds of people and situations.”

What started out being a compilation of her observations turned out to be a lot more personal and revealing about her, Goldie and Ranveer than she “ever wanted, expected or dreamt of” it being. When the book was ready, she panicked—“I was such a private person; I wasn’t even on Twitter!”—and was willing to put it away as a not-so-wasted effort, because at least it had given her a chance to introspect.

Goldie was most pleased about the chapter on fathers. “He felt parenting becomes all about mother… what about him and men like him who want to be hands-on? Even in educated households, mothers-in-law will say, ‘Arrey woh toh maa ka kaam hai, why are you doing it?’ It’s frustrating because a lot of fathers want to be involved.”

More importantly, he, and the book in general, have pushed her boundaries. “When people come to interview you as a Bollywood actress, they are not interested in your answers or what you think, beyond a point.” There is a construct of an actress of a certain generation, I agree, and Sonali says she never fit in. “There’s a hidden Goth in me; I have a dark sense of humour; I have a dark sense of fashion. I’m a straight lines, no-fuss person. I’m actually the opposite of what my profession wants me to be, in a sense.”

But it was a private non-conformism, not one she broadcast to the world. “Goldie told me that, if my grouse was that I was never asked interesting questions and wasn’t on social media, how, exactly, was anyone to know me, to know any different?”

This was around the time she was doing talent shows, opening up, saying what she had to say, unscripted. And, for someone who had once said she was terrified of social media, she’s finally on it, enjoying it and admitting that staying away had been a mistake.

Sonali on Trivia

"At film interviews, they only ever want trivia—they are not interested in anything but the trivia. My favourite colour, food, book, movie, song, eye colour, perfume… all those sorts of things.

I’ve always given different answers at different points of time because it actually changes for me. And sometimes I’ve given different answers for cheap thrills. Then there are days when I tell the truth: ‘I’m actually allergic to perfume, I don’t use it.’

No one has ever contradicted saying, ‘But last time you said black. How are you saying white is your favourite colour?’ Because nobody’s bothered to read it; no one’s really interested. It is trivia and it is trivial."

A large part of her new interest in (and knowledge about) technology and social media has come for and from Ranveer. He’s 10 and on Instagram, and it’s terrifying. “As Goldie says, we can’t ban him, so now I join him.” In any case, as she says in the book, her principal ideas of new-age parenting are learning and growing with your children (they ask “Google God”), and relying on their ability to self-censor. So far it’s working. “I’ve had times where he has said, ‘Mama, that’s PG 13, I know I’m not supposed to see it.’”

There was this time when Sonali was cutting his nails and he said, “This is the finger that I’m not supposed to show right?”

“He was six or seven! Kids are exposed to so much more; there is so much more happening. They are going to see it; they are going to hear that F word… So you bring up your child to understand the right and wrong much earlier than we did: what I would have had to know at 15 or 16, he has to know at five or six.”

Sonali on Being Her Mother’s Daughter

Much like her parents, giving her child the tools to handle the world is key to Sonali and Goldie’s parenting strategy. Despite having more flops than hits, she was working with every top star and banner in the country—and attributes this to her professionalism and independence.

“My mother never came to the sets.

I have a younger sister and she said, ‘I have a daughter at home who needs me. If you were working in an office, you think I would be sitting next to you at a desk?’ was her question.

I said, ‘No, but everybody’s mother seems to go with them.’

She said, ‘I can’t. You have to grow up at some point and handle a few things on your own. I will have to trust my upbringing and believe that you will take the right decisions. I would only tell you one thing—just remember, it’s never too late to turn back and come home. The doors are always going to be open.’

That has been my life lesson, and I just hope I can do that for my child. Because I think there’s nothing more you can do than that.”

Sonali is unabashed about being from a regular middle-class Maharashtrian family; a product of a series of Kendriya Vidyalaya schools as a result of her father’s transferable government job. The rootlessness has left her with the ability to project a false sense of being comfortable and be friendly while never totally opening up, and the confidence to give up trying to fit in.

And then she met and married Goldie—a boy with deep roots in Juhu, Mumbai, where he’s grown up and they now live, and in the film industry, where he’s third-generation. “There are a lot of people who are family; a lot of people who are such close friends that they are like family.”

She muses over her mug of coffee for a moment. “Maybe I became a loner because we travelled so much,” adding that writing letters to friends didn’t really work. She reaps the benefits of Goldie’s tapestry of connections: “Juhu’s like a village! It’s a great support system, especially for a child… and we are, eventually, social animals.”

Life is coming full circle, though Facebook, that has been the amalgamation of connections past for most of us, hasn’t worked as well for her. With a touch of the endearing naïve befuddlement à la those aunties who still send the ‘FWD: FWD: FWD’ jokes, this social media newbie says, “There are lot of strange people who tell me we were classmates... in schools I’ve never been to…” She attributes her not recognising the ‘former classmates’ who add her to a poor memory for names and faces; I propose the obvious instead. It’s the stardom—people remember meeting or having been in school with someone who became famous, and are happy to invent and exaggerate friendships. Then there’s the platoon of creeps, of course.

Her husband and her have a special connection, despite their apparent dissimilarities. Like her, he started working, grew up really early in life, owing to the early death of his father. He’s more romantic than she is, the “dramas” of flowers and jewellery were never part of her life. That she forgets birthdays and anniversaries (and doesn’t mind if people forget hers) is something Goldie is just about coming to terms with—it’s the small gestures that matter. “That’s the person I am, and I think that, again, comes from the rootlessness. It’s not such a big deal, those dates… you take whatever comes.”

It is his decision not to have a second child, and she’s happy to go with his conviction. “He says we’ve had enough responsibilities, so there should be a time where we have none. We’ve never done what our teenage friends were doing, so are really looking forward to having that time out to ourselves.” Doing what, exactly? “You know, travel, learn something… Maybe there are certain things that teenagers do that we’ll never feel like doing; other things we would want to do…”

Obviously not someone who dwells on regrets, Sonali does regret how late she started working out. As a skinny person, she didn’t need to workout to lose weight—now, she realises muscles are her best friends, and she doesn’t have enough of those. She started when Ranveer was around three, not to lose the postpartum weight but to keep up with him. The working injuries started catching up; her core and joints were like jelly.

Physiotherapy got her started; now, she does cardio and strength training at the local gym, but not more than four days a week, not more than half an hour. “Any more becomes boring and mindless.” She does functional training at home on days she can’t make it to the gym in the morning.

“My routine is very simple, because I realised that the more complicated the exercise sessions are, the less likely I am to make it for them. They have to be simple and doable in my daily routine.” Everyone has to figure out his or her own way to do it—much like her parenting mantra.

Letting people see the real you, not giving a damn and being yourself in public is a crucial, liberating step in the evolution of a person, an artist, charting his or her own path, I believe. Though she’s not a hundred per cent there yet, she’s followed a classic trajectory. “I was very young when I started, so I’ve tried to conform and do things as they are meant to be.” But, beyond that, “I never tried to fit in, and I’m not even today. I don’t see any reason why I should want to fit in.”

The real Sonali Bendre Behl stands up.


An edited version of this interview was the cover story of Good Housekeeping in January 2016.

Interview: Shraddha Kapoor by Tara Kaushal

October 2015: A dreamer, a learner, a doer. The multitalented actress Shraddha Kapoor seeks to be everything she is not.

The cover of Harper's Bazaar.

The cover of Harper's Bazaar.

She’s sitting in exactly the same place—on a sofa under a portrait of her father, in the Kapoors’ apartment facing Silver Beach in Juhu, Mumbai—as she was when we last spoke. She’s in give-a-damn clothes as before, a long-sleeved deep blue tee, skinny jeans, and laceless ankle boots in deep tan, with not a hint of make-up.

But I instantly sense something fundamental has changed about—evolved in—Shraddha Kapoor in the past year.

Once she starts talking, nineteen to the dozen, it’s not hard to figure out what it is. As a “creative, curious person,” she has always wanted to “have as many life experiences as possible” and to be in films. She hails from a family of performers and has always been a talented all-round one herself—she’s studied theatre, Kathak, Odissi, street jazz, and even the piano for 10 years! Now, watching her dreams dovetailing and coming true, making a mark with four hits in a six-film career, this 26-year-old seems to have gained a deep confidence and is emanating a powerful creative energy.

Although I’d met her last after her performance in the fabulous Haider, she is only now embracing the self-assurance of success and recognition. “When my first two films didn't do well, I was really shaken. You know how terrible it feels when you have failures.”

However, she feels more than fortunate now. “Everyday I have a moment of realisation that I am just so blessed to be getting the opportunities I’m getting.” There’s the travelling, of course. Director Mohit Suri got her to sing Galliyan for Ek Villain, during which she also got to relive her passion for scuba diving in the underwater sequence. “For ABCD2, Varun (Dhawan) and I got a chance to dance with the country’s best professional dancers. Who gets such a chance?”

She says her passions are intertwining, and she has the best job in the world. And she’s throbbing with inspiration. But there is also the awareness that it’s fleeting, that a Friday hit/flop can determine your standing and how people treat you.

So she’s seizing these chances wholeheartedly, keeping her nose to the grindstone and giving each one her best. And it shows—Rajeev Masand of CNN-IBN wrote about the “sheer hard work” of ABCD2’s leads: “Both actors hold their own against the professionals without losing face.” Rani Mukherjee also recently told Kapoor that her hard work could be seen in every shot. Dhawan, a childhood friend, too comments on her dedication, calling her “a go-getter, someone who wants to get better and better.” She thinks these are the best kind of compliments to get.

Kapoor is also a believer in “the power of the universe”, that the universe will conspire to make something you truly want happen. “That’s what I really feel every day.” Take, for instance, Rock On!! 2, her upcoming project for which she’s been at band rehearsals all day at Yash Raj Studios. She remembers watching the first instalment with her family when it was released eight years ago, and being so blown away by the movie that she thought, “I must be really crazy to think this… but if they make a Rock On!! 2, I have to be in it.” And here she is, playing a singer in the movie, singing her own songs, playing the piano, alongside most of the original cast (“Oh My God!”) and some other biggies. She can barely contain herself.

Another project in the pipeline is Baaghi: A Rebel for Love, an action-romantic film opposite Tiger Shroff. They’ve just shot one song thus far—“I had to dance in five-inch heels while Tiger was doing his spins and flips, not fair,” she mock-complains, laughing. She leaves for Kerala the day after this interview to shoot for the latter, then to Shillong for the former.

Kapoor likes the excitement of changing skins, hair, make-up, and looks between characters, doing different roles. Since Tanya Ghavri’s become her stylist, she’s also been exploring her relationship with fashion in a deeper way. Though her personal style was “bohemian”, she now enjoys couture for events and magazine covers.

With a life so full of loves and passions—including Instagram and Snapchat that she now prefers to Twitter—I ask her what she thinks of love, the romantic kind. “I am open to it. I feel like love can come, spring up on you and surprise you at anytime.” It’s clearly not a priority though (“What is Tinder?”), and she’s not seeking. “I need to work on my skills, explore my passions. If it has to happen it will happen, if it doesn’t, it’s fine. I have my other loves that I am happy with.”

She reveals that she also writes, incidentally, and has been doing so since she was little. What about? “I write what I’m feeling and to capture my day. I just write to remember my experiences when am older.” She recently reread her last entry as a 19-year-old, about all the flowers and excitement of turning 20… “It’s so interesting to go back to that.” Does she rewatch her performances as well? “No, surprisingly, not since their screenings! I’m waiting to do so,” she says, wondrously aware that the benchmarks in her personal journey are public ones, frozen in celluloid for eternity.

“She has really grown,” says Dhawan. “People thought she was over, and now look at her—she’s shown everyone who Shraddha Kapoor is.”

On her part, Kapoor says, “You have one life, and you want to try and do whatever you can do in it. Why not? Whether you are good at it or suck at it or are great at it—that’s a different story.” Carpe diem.


An edited version of this interview was the cover story of Harper’s Bazaar in October 2015. Read another interview of Shraddha Kapoor here.

Are You Your Own Worst Critic? by Tara Kaushal

August 2015: This media environment perpetuates a lack of self-esteem and feelings of envy in all aspects of your life, from beauty to romance, money and lifestyle. Is your self-perception in need of a shot of positivity?

Beautiful. Rich. Thin. Famous. Happy. Loved. Holidaying. Everyone is—going by the sparkly adverts on TV and in the glossies, the fairy-tale lives of stars and socialites in the gossip columns and on Page 3, and the Facebook posts of that detested school prefect. Everyone but you, that is. Or so it seems.

The ‘Perfect’ Myth

With advances in the internet, photography, advertising and technology, we’re consuming more media and advertising than ever before. Unrealistically stunning models sell impossible dreams—some tea in high towers, others bottles of creams.

And then, unwittingly or not, you’re in. We internalise these ‘idealised’ standards and are impacted by them. We are sucked into the vortex of this vicious cycle in our own thoughts and actions, at once victims and perpetuators of this myth.

Are You a Victim?

We’ve started to undervalue the beauty in ourselves and our lives, and some of us find it hard to see the beauty in ourselves at all. It’s time to evaluate if your self-perception is, indeed, skewed.

* Do you find the need to live up to the Jones’s, unable to count your blessings?
* Do you feel everyone’s doing better than you?
* Do you compare your post-baby body to Malaika Arora’s or your cellulite-ridden thighs to the gap between Kate Moss’s? Or, worse, a friend on Facebook?
* Do you evaluate your acne and aging on the basis of celebrities’ flawless skins?
* And, on social media, do you compare the likes and comments on your page to the number on others’?
* Do you suffer from Social Media Anxiety Disorder?

Don’t worry, you are not alone.

What is SMAD?

Coined by cyber-relations expert Julia Spira in her book The Rules of Netiquette, it explores the guidelines of interacting in the digital world. Here’s part of her checklist to know if you've got SMAD.

1. You’re addicted to your cell phone
2. You become anxious if you send a tweet to someone and they don't @reply to you within six hours
3. You keeping checking for likes and shares on a photo you uploaded on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram or other photo-sharing sites, even if no one is liking or sharing it
4. You get upset if the number of your Twitter followers drops

But Wait a Minute…

This, despite knowing, as we all do, that all that glitters ain’t really diamond-crusted gold?! Here are some things for you to remember:

* Photoshop! Photoshop! Photoshop!

Let’s put it this way—unless you’re in the media, it’s safe to assume that image manipulation, popularly known as Photoshop, is more widespread than you think, however wide you think it is. As people in the media, we are used to assuming that everyone knows the models in advertisements are unrealistically stunning because, well, they aren’t real—everyone looks great with makeup, studio lights, a great photographer and that insidious little monster called Photoshop. Agrees celebrity dermatologist Dr Rashmi Shetty, “We think image manipulation is common knowledge, but it isn’t.” And this is in cities with literate people consuming mainstream English media that contains articles like this one from time to time.

First of all, let the name not fool you, it’s not only still images that are manipulated, even videos are. Yup, that’s how Angelina Jolie manages plays all sorts of roles despite her tattoos in real life.

Increasingly, it is applied to more images and videos than you know. From apps that allow you to edit camera-phone pictures and video on the spot, to high-end retouching agencies working on every single advertising and editorial image and video you see. And it can do more things than you’d imagined. If they could create Harvey Dent without actually burning off half of actor Aaron Eckart’s face, what’s a little leg elongation and bust enhancement?

“Most people have never met a star face-to-face, so assume that’s what they look like in real life. Naturally this will impact the way women look at themselves,” says Dr Shetty. So the next time you compare your butt to Nicki ‘Anaconda’ Minage’s, remember to chant ‘Photoshop! Photoshop! Photoshop!’

* You’re Being Made to Feel This Way

Consumerism thrives in the chasm between have and want, am and should be. It breeds in insecurity, seeking to define your happiness through that next bag, that perfect body, that luxury holiday, that next dream.

Multinational corporations’ dollars influence social standards and fan your insecurities, and so it is bloody hard to “keep your head when those around you are losing theirs”, to quote that famous poem. You’d have to a sanyasi in a cave to not to get affected by standards of beauty, wealth, body type, success, happiness and lifestyle all around.

* There’s No Such Thing as a Fairy Tale

Just as we’ve grown up dreaming of happily-ever-afters in a romantic sense, we’ve also dreamt of a ‘perfect’ life. It isn’t, neither yours nor anyone else’s.

Notice how some friends on social media get active only while on European holidays, tagging this and Instagramming that, nary mentioning the mundanity of their daily office jobs, or the many late nights, stress, heartbreak and missed Sports’ Days it took to save up for those trips. Notice how mother-baby pictures always reflect only the joy, the knee-length under-eye circles, sleepless nights, post-baby weight and other challenges of real-life motherhood all glossed over. And happy couple pictures show no hint of either the farting or the fighting!

It is no wonder that we, women in particular but also people in general, are comparing and contrasting ourselves with an artificial idea of ‘normal’, to the perpetually perfect persona that most of us formulate online. Not that I’m recommending you or your friends all become social-media whiners and bores instead. But, realise that, just as you don’t always post your private troubles and have a propensity towards only taking pictures in happy moments, everyone else is doing so too.

And, let’s not forget that we’re all mostly photo-chronicling the moments where we look our best—made-up for parties or weddings. Just as your out-of-bed look isn’t as great as your party one, your friends don’t always look that good!

As long as you’re aware if this big increase-envy, reduce-self-esteem downside of social media, you’ll be able to better enjoy its many positives.

On social media, we all perpetuate the myth of the perpetually perfect persona.

More Help at Hand!

Many art and media projects have been addressing the effects of photography, advertising, media and social media on culture and women. Beyond seeing pictorial comparisons before-and-after makeup and Photoshop, and uncensored celebrities’ candids (wrinkles, et al), these projects will help you feel better about your looks and life…

Must read: The Beauty Myth

Long before the media exploded like it has today, American feminist author Naomi Wolf, in her iconic 1991 work The Beauty Myth, wrote about the damaging effects of the obsession with physical perfection. Modern women’s insecurities are heightened by unrealistic images and the corresponding societal and internal expectations, then exploited by the diet, cosmetic and plastic surgery industries, trapping them in an endless spiral of self-consciousness, hope and self-hatred. It impacts all areas of life—work, religion, sex, violence and hunger.

Although the book is almost a quarter century old and based in America, it nevertheless rings deep and true for the Indian woman of today. A true eye-opener, it will never leave you.

Must watch: What's On Your Mind?

“Facebook can be depressing because everyone else's lives are better than yours... But are they really?” reads the introduction to this short video that’s been viewed over a million times since it was uploaded a year ago. Created by the HigtonBros, it compares a man’s real life and his parallel one on Facebook, and his friends’ responses to them.

What’s On Your Mind? strikes a universal cord, and is two and a half minutes very well spent.

Must watch: Killing Us Softly

Jean Killbourne’s Killing Us Softly series focuses on the impact advertising has on the way women view ourselves, and the way men view us. She explores how the concept of ideal female beauty, absolute flawlessness achieved through make-up and Photoshop, impacts women’s self esteem. And since women’s body language in ads is usually passive and vulnerable, it propagates an unhealthy idea of ‘normal’. It changes the way men feel about the very real women in their lives, and the objectification and dismemberment of women’s bodies and passive body language creates an increasingly “toxic cultural environment” that propagates violence.

You will find yourself nodding along with Killbourne as she explains her ideas with relevant pictures in a series of presentations, and will come away with a deeper understanding of the world around you.

Must see: BeautyFull

Concerned about the impact of the photography and media eruption has on society, culture and women in India, photographer Sahil Mane started his art-ivism project BeautyFull in 2013, inspired by the writings of his wife, yours truly.

“The steady diet of images creates a homogenous ‘normal’ and idealised (and fake) ‘beauty’,” he says. Though the show, he seeks to dispel the idea of an ideal beauty, and hopes to “empower men and women with the realisation that there are as many beautifuls as there are people.” While the project will eventually lead to a photo-art show, it has so far involved public performances in various places including the Kala Ghoda Arts Fest this year. Here, Sahil and I invited people to participate in a few photo and video performance art pieces, spanning skin tone, beauty treatments, image manipulation and ‘The Tootsie Experiment’, where men confronted the standards of female beauty they subconsciously carried.

Some Things to Think About

As with all things, balance and self-awareness are key to beating the negative impacts of the images and messaging we’re all always consuming today.

As with everything from plastic surgery to fashion, the balance one has to strike is between whether you’re doing it to improve yourself, be the best you can be, or because you’re doing it for or trying to look like someone else. Does the urge originate from comparison or from within?

Dr Shetty observes that those who don’t go overboard or have unrealistic aesthetic expectations are those who seek treatments for themselves—“These people tend to treat a wrinkle or a blemish as any other problem that needs solving.” And why not, she asks. “Like you keep your house clean, wear certain clothes… if you want to look good, great. Do it for yourself.”

And about the envy-inducing lives of others, ponder on the word ‘sonder’, from The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows: ‘the realisation that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own.’


An edited version of this article appeared in Good Housekeeping in August 2015.

Shahid-Mira, The Age-old Age Question by Tara Kaushal

July 2015: Is there something creepy about an age gap as vast as their 13 years?

I’m no Bollywood fan, nor star crazy or anything of the sort. But try as I might, I haven’t been able to escape all the little details about the 'private' affair that was Shahid Kapoor and Mira Rajput’s wedding. All over the internet and in the papers, I’ve been force-fed oh-so-important nuggets of information (the bride comes with Anamika Khanna, Anita Dongre and Masaba Gupta in her trousseau; the groom refused to sport mehendi at the ceremony). Aside from concerns about how we are increasingly becoming a celebrity culture, the little piece of information that’s really been troubling me is their age gap. More specifically, the age of the bride.

My husband, who’s two years younger than me, and I have a running inside joke. We call it the ‘Pygmalion Project’, after the George Bernard Shaw play Pygmalion, which, in turn, is based on the Greek story of a sculptor by the same name who decided to create a sculpture of the perfect woman. My Fair Lady, the classic film is based on the play.

Anyway, in the film and the play, an older man, Professor Henry Higgins teaches and moulds a poor younger woman, Eliza Doolittle into a high-society girl. So whenever I give Sahil lots of gyan about something or the other (and vice versa), he’s my ‘Pygmalion Project’ (and I his). In seriousness, we also use the term to describe couples we know or know of who have a skewed power dynamic and experience gap between them. Like in my first marriage.

When I was younger, I gathered that it was important to marry young. “The older you get, the more set in your ways you get; it’s harder to adjust to a partner,” was the refrain I would hear. And I did! I married a 31-year-old when I was 19, and that didn’t work out so well.

I don’t think the problem was the age gap—I know some perfectly happy couples with many years between them. The problem was me: how young I was, how little I knew myself, how well he knew himself, and the corresponding clashes as I grew.

Today, the very reason touted in favour of marrying young is the one I use to recommend marrying later in life. (I’m using the word to mean ‘finding a long-term partner’, the legality/sociocultural aspect of ‘marriage’ aside.) It’s important to grow up, know who you are, find yourself, travel, live, fuck, etc, before you decide to commit to a lifetime with one person, especially if the person is much older. And conventional (as Shahid is known to be).

If the pattern in his long list of past relationships with female actresses, as reported by the media, is anything to go by, Mr Kapoor cannot handle his women being more successful than himself. He also seems to suffer from the dichotomy of the typical Indian male—wanting ‘hot’ girlfriends but a ‘good’ wife. (In this case she’s selected by the family, so double points, yay!) To make matters worse, he’s the rich and famous ‘catch’ in the relationship.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t wish them ill any more than I do any random couple I’ve never met. They look happy enough. I just hope he respects her and treats her as an equal, and supports her career if she wants one, no matter that it pales against his. And that he lets her grow, not like as vine around his path and personality, but as an individual in her own right.


An edited version of this article appeared on iDiva in July 2015.

Congratulating Sapna Bhavnani by Tara Kaushal

July 2015: All praise for her speaking out about being gang raped in the viral Humans of Mumbai post.

They say there are two reasons one keeps secrets—because something is private or because something is wrong. Over the years, I find that secrets play an increasingly insignificant role in my life. Because, in my quest to have/be an ‘integrated personality’ (my friend Jordyn’s term for being the same person in all situations while responding to context, of course), I’ve been seeking to dispel the ‘private’ and reduce doing—and creating secrets of—things that I consider ‘wrong’.

In one aspect, Sapna’s and my views on secrets differ. “It took me 20 years to voice my incident, but for me a woman keeping it all within her because she has no other choice isn’t a sign of weakness—it’s a mark of strength and something we need to start respecting,” she says in her viral Humans of Mumbai post about being gang raped at 24. To my mind, the “no other choice” bit of the sentence contradicts the ‘silence is a mark of strength’ assertion, but I’m going to let that slide. At this point, I cannot compliment Ms Bhavnani enough.

Though she and I know each other and say hello when we see each other at parties, we’re not friends or anything. I’ve always admired her spunk, from the time she was writing those Sex and The City-style columns in Mumbai Mirror back in the day. Over the years I’ve watched her become increasingly activistic on Facebook where we are connected, stray cat this and village that, making the shift away from Bollywood that had claimed her for a brief moment. Then there was her role in the evocative play Nirbhaya

And now this. Her post is a win in so many ways, big and small.

There’s the casual back-at-ya censure of society for labelling a 14-year-old a "whore" for talking to boys, driving motorcycles and smoking; and the contrast with Western freedoms. There’s the appropriation of the word ‘whore’, loud and proud.

Most important is her assertion that she never let the incident break her spirit.

One of the many problems with Indians’ attitudes towards rape is the exaggerated ‘haaaaw’ that society reserves for survivors. Even when it’s well-meaning: there were those who said it was good Jyoti Singh Pandey died, whatever would the poor thing do without her honour if she had survived?!

Don’t get me wrong: being raped is a terrible thing to happen to someone, raping someone is one of the worst things you can do. But victims of sexual violence left with no permanent physical damage could well choose to deal with the emotional scars by brushing the incident off as just another stick in the hole, no permanent physical damage done, big deal.

I have. Sapna took a (deeply symbolic) shower, and then pushed the incident to the back of her mind. This is not an option for women in environment where there are permanent social repercussions to reinforce the momentousness of that moment—as though your own emotional and physical trauma wasn’t enough.

Unlike most victims of sexual violence who internalise blame, it appears that Sapna kept the rape secret because it was private, and not because she felt she was in the wrong.

“I still wear short dresses and the brightest red on my lips,” she says, standing out as a beacon of hope. Yes, there can be—and is—life after rape. (Or anything else for that matter. As Jung said, “I am not what happened to me, I am what I choose to become.")

I’m glad she’s said it, after “keeping it all within her” all this while, and for the number of people it’s reached. I scroll down her Timeline and, 10 minutes of scrolling later, I’m still only seeing the flood of congratulatory messages  (filled with words like "inspiration", "hero") coming her way about this post.

Here’s mine.


An edited version of this article appeared on iDiva in July 2015.

Why Liberals Should Wear Our Hearts On Our Sleeves by Tara Kaushal

July 2015: #selfiewithdaughter & #lovewins: despite the criticisms, these two campaigns are social media wins.

These past few days, I’ve been reading a number of updates, tweets and comments, and having a number of conversations about both, #selfiewithdaughter, and #celebratepride and #lovewins. There are those going yay-yay, there are those going nay-nay. But, you know what, I’m a yay-yay.

One could argue that the selfie culture is only skin deep, and that there is a lot of more meaningful work left to be done on the governance and policy level—“how can you have a #selfiewithdaughter campaign but at the same time not criminalise marital rape in India, saying that it’s a ‘personal issue’ that is sensitive and so the government doesn’t want to take a stand?” asks Ishita. Shruti Seth asked the PM to “try reform”, and got trolled for it by blind Modi bhakts.

And one could say that love has only won in America, take a chill-pill Indians, we’re still in the dark ages, far from decriminalising gay sex, let alone celebrating gay marriage.

These criticisms are all true and, as someone deeply involved with gender and equal rights issues, I am well aware of all the work left to be done on both these fronts.

But I am also aware of how skin-deep the world is at the moment, where all that glitters is seen as gold. We see the negatives of this every day—from men and women who base standards of beauty on airbrushed images to the damage caused to Australian treasurer Joe Hockey’s reputation by headlines and tweets that proclaimed ‘Treasurer for sale’ (he isn’t corrupt, the stories were about a fundraising activity and he’s since won a defamation case against Fairfax Media).

It’s also interesting to explore the definition of ‘liberal’. Many of us liberals have been content with living and letting live, ‘your rights end where my feelings begin’, a social laissez faire. Increasingly (and ironically) though, it has become important to fight for the right to be oneself (and to let others be themselves), to be left in peace unless you’re hurting something other than ‘culture’. Militant upholders of mainstream culture and religion—those that propagate ideas against daughters and gay people—are pretty proud and loud, in case you haven’t noticed. Too blatant and outspoken about your liberal ideas? You’re a ‘sickular’ bitch who must be jailed.

In this environment, then, it is important to declare ones support for ones ideas, if marching on the streets is not for you. So when we take and propagate #selfiewithdaughter and make our profile pictures rainbow-coloured, we’re aligning ourselves with our beliefs, even if the expression is skin-deep, frothy and feel-good. We’re counting ourselves (and being counted as) people who believe in women’s and gay rights, even if (especially since) they aren’t yet constitutionally and socially guaranteed, even if it is armchair activism. We’re declaring that we want a certain type of world, even if we’re not actively going and seeking it. We’re coming out of the closet with our counter-culture beliefs, even if, in the former case, it propagated by the same government that is simultaneously regressive.

I’ve never been one to follow the ‘if you can’t say anything good, don’t say anything at all’ adage. In this case, though, may I recommend that, if you are indeed a believer in women’s and gay rights (human rights, really), please keep the hole poking of these feel-good campaigns to yourself. There are enough regressives out there doing just that, for motives more sinister than yours.


An edited version of this article appeared on iDiva in July 2015.